Difference between revisions of "Walking On The Moon: The Untold Story Of The Police And The Rise Of New Wave Rock"

From PoliceWiki
m (External links and reviews)
m (Quotations and trivia)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
From the book's inside flap:  
 
From the book's inside flap:  
 
::''"Ambition brought the Police together. It also tore them apart – but not before they became the biggest band in the world and the first supergroup of the 1980s. In Walking the on the Moon, British writer Chris Campion tells the full, uncensored story of the spectacular rise of the Police."''
 
::''"Ambition brought the Police together. It also tore them apart – but not before they became the biggest band in the world and the first supergroup of the 1980s. In Walking the on the Moon, British writer Chris Campion tells the full, uncensored story of the spectacular rise of the Police."''
 +
 +
=Fan reaction=
 +
Fan reaction to this book was overall less than positive. Many fans felt that the author was unduly negative and critical of the band throughout, and also pointed out numerous factual errors to be found within in the text.[http://www.stewartcopeland.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11113],[http://www.stewartcopeland.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10993],[http://blog.fanhistory.com/?p=1109]
  
 
=Quotations and trivia=
 
=Quotations and trivia=

Revision as of 05:16, 16 January 2010


Walking on the Moon: The Untold Story of the Police and the Rise of New Wave Rock
Walking on the moon book.jpg
Author: Chris Campion
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Publisher: Wiley
Publication date: 2009-09-28
ISBN: 978-0470282403

Introduction

From the book's inside flap:

"Ambition brought the Police together. It also tore them apart – but not before they became the biggest band in the world and the first supergroup of the 1980s. In Walking the on the Moon, British writer Chris Campion tells the full, uncensored story of the spectacular rise of the Police."

Fan reaction

Fan reaction to this book was overall less than positive. Many fans felt that the author was unduly negative and critical of the band throughout, and also pointed out numerous factual errors to be found within in the text.[1],[2],[3]

Quotations and trivia

This section needs more information.

Editions

This section needs more information.

See also

This section needs more information.

External links and reviews

References